LongJohnSilver: @El Maestro Misterio: I think what Ears was trying to say is that paheal has another website made especially for cosplay porn. When it comes to celeb fakes, they exist, that's why this website has porn of them. You can find a pic of two computers humping each other on this site, yet the celebrity fakes are the pics that confuse you?
El_Maestro_Misterio: @LongJohnSilver: No, the celebrity fakes don't CONFUSE me. I just don't know why they're allowed. See the following:
15. Do not post fakes (photoshops) of celebrities, unless they are in character (ex. >>318692 and >>190610). Political and major social figures are allowed, however. Note: drawn celebrity images are welcome. Also: the "in character" requirement does not apply if the celebrity has less than a page of pics.
Anonymous2: Here is some technical shit that will help with the celebrity fakes. 1. A character is not an actor, they are "technically" not real people. 2. A nonexistent person can't be celebrity. 3. If they are not real and not a celebrity, then technically they can't be faked. I can get more in depth on how nothing is really a fake, but that would probably just waste your time.
El_Maestro_Misterio: And yet there are so many that are posted without being a character. Musicians, sports figures, etc. It probably wouldn't get on my nerves so much if faked images didn't all look like so much shit.
Anonymous3: Sorry but this isn't even sexy, and to say the least; why do girls even get pictures like this taken? Vaginas are ugly as fuck unless their folded ham shit is packed nice and neat underneath the soft pillows.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
15. Do not post fakes (photoshops) of celebrities, unless they are in character (ex. >>318692 and >>190610). Political and major social figures are allowed, however. Note: drawn celebrity images are welcome. Also: the "in character" requirement does not apply if the celebrity has less than a page of pics.