Anonymous7(2): (A2 here) I think you mean don't need to be a chef to shit on a a plate. The ocular did doesn't make sense since chef's aren't the only people with eyes.
Not quite getting the reference though. Inability? Sir or madame I thought I made it fairly clear that it takes a grand amount of skill to suck so grandly at facial expressions and yet garner little to no insult on bodily portions of the art. Many artists paint like a child possessed by 13 and three fifths of a demon during certain artistic stages.
Anonymous8(1): Naw, what I posted is what I meant.
Same face again and again and again and again, fuck off with these excuses already. If people can jerk themselves raw to the same handful of poses that's fine, but they're also free to call artists out on laziness.
Anonymous10: (A2 here) You seriously think the artist is commenting here? I imagine you don't actually, but just sounds like it for a moment so I wanted to clarify. If this is about the comic, the ending is what some of us call 'a joke'.
Anyway, correct on the notations you gave, if perhaps a bit black and white. In a humorous way really.
abloo bloo bloo
Not quite getting the reference though. Inability? Sir or madame I thought I made it fairly clear that it takes a grand amount of skill to suck so grandly at facial expressions and yet garner little to no insult on bodily portions of the art. Many artists paint like a child possessed by 13 and three fifths of a demon during certain artistic stages.
Same face again and again and again and again, fuck off with these excuses already. If people can jerk themselves raw to the same handful of poses that's fine, but they're also free to call artists out on laziness.
Fact of the matter is that it take much longer to make art than it does critique it and I wonder if anyone considers the difference.
Reminds me a bit of a certain comic.
http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/12/13
Anyway, correct on the notations you gave, if perhaps a bit black and white. In a humorous way really.
- Reply