main image
- Reply
Anonymous1: Again, if you use an AI to generate artwork, you have no reason or ability to call yourself an artist and have a name for yourself.
- Reply
Anonymous2: @Anonymous: You're an idiot. It's quite literally not "their" art.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: "Planned out what they wanted to see" as if that requires so much planning, "put in the right terms and descriptions" as if that needs "and then shared it here" as if that's a difficult action in itself, lmao, what a retard you are, to think you equate AI "art" to actual "art". Consider euthanasia, you'd do virtually everyone a favor, you absolute failure.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: I didn't read whatever essay you just wrote to me, I have enough clarification that you're exactly that, a retard who needs to off themselves. Go prove your shitty, unworthy of reading, subhuman take to AI artists, maybe they'll prompt for you a picture or two of Pomni or whatever "hip with the kids" shit you're into. Honestly, you AI bitch boys are like NFT bros, always feel the need to pathetically defend yourselves.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: Or better yet, could you AI prompt me a picture of your biological relatives fucking you or did they abandon you after they saw what an abomination they got? Imagine still thinking that you need to be an expert creator to criticize creations.
- Reply
Anonymous3: Average opinion haver here. I think ai art is fine. It takes less skill than traditional art, yes, but that just means it's a different medium, similar to how photography is easier than painting. Some artists use ai as a starting point and edit the image using more traditional techniques, which takes a lot of skill and results in a wonderful mix of style that I think is super interesting. Should these artists have a name for themselves? Absolutely. But should everyone who types "vanessa with fat tits" into a text box be considered an artist and make money off of the output? Probably not.

Life isn't black and white, AI art definitely has valid criticisms, especially that most of the training data was stolen from artists who didn't consent to their art being used. Also it looks fucking weird most of the time. But turning nuanced conversations into arguments doesn't help us understand where the other people are coming from.

Basically, chill out. Have empathy.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: Still didn't read whatever paragraph of shit you wrote. You overestimate your own value. How much time did you spend typing it and thinking on it? Answer in 4 words or less, because I'm still not going to be reading your poems of self-pity and attempts of justifying your lack of talent and a brain. Now shoo, back to your own doghouse, else you get no treats.

@Anonymous: Finally, a good argument. Yeah, AI art can be fine, I even like a few, but most people do "vanessa with fat tits", upload it everywhere, then some dickweeds post that here and pat themselves on the back for being a good contributor to the website. They don't even tag "AI-generated" part of the time, like sebusca. Using AI as a starting point for making porn while editing the pic is acceptable, it definitely takes some skill to retouch them, but I struggle to imagine these people deciding to learn from it and beginning to draw their own stuff. So I don't think they deserve to have a name for that unless they do a spectacular job. Unfortunately, most AI """"artists"""" like I bet the fuckboy above just prompt whatever, try to scam people out of money via Patreon and then desperately claim they put actual effort into it. If you notice, the very first Anon expressed a strong opinion and that @Anonymous scum immediately went for the shit talk, then thought he was worth being listened to (figuratively) and understood.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: I'm still not reading your trash. Wait, hey, nobody allowed you out of the doghouse. Get back into there.
- Reply
Anonymous4: Anon2, I agree with you but I think you're retarded. Don't post walls of text, they scream autism here.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: How did you live so long if you can't even follow direct orders? Such a stroke of luck. And you're still typing paragraphs of text, I guess still trying to defend something? Remember, doghouse, or up for adoption you go again.

@Anonymous: Hey, don't stop him. I'm squeezing the most out of the retard here.
avatar
- Reply
MrJudge: @Anonymous: Man, you broke him! He's not making tons of text now. Such a waste of a toy right here. Oh well, let's see if I can resuscitate his interest and keep him hooked for a little longer with this one little trick...
@Anonymous: First time I'm going to read your message now. "I was done with this 3 months ago", evidently not since you came back to this and keep coming back, but keep deluding yourself and others how little you care, schizo. You even stole my dog bit, how cute! Am I rubbing off on you or something? That's a good doggy, gotta adapt to your owners. Adoption's off the table, but you better behave from now on.


Report an ad?