Anonymous3: @Anonymous: i honestly think you're overthinking it. if it looks good does the canon age matter? you can just pretend they cross your threshold, it's all imagination
Anonymous6: @Anonymous:
-Lucy is 8yo
-Lola is 5yo
-somehow 3 year make it acceptable
1. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
2. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
3. Are you retarded?
4. They are fucking cartoons dude
Anonymous7: @Anonymous: anon 3 here, I'm just saying if it really bothered them they could just pretend the character is whatever age in this drawing. Why not? It's not real anyways.
Anonymous8: Oh, I'm sorry guys, I totally know I sound weird. I know they're cartoons, they're drawings, the canon is one thing but as characters they were probably designed and created the same day, I know all of that.
I just think one is allowed to have gut reactions to things. You don't have to agree with me. I just happen to think five year olds are too young for the activity being depicted here, and I could even defend that view with valid argumentation, but my reaction to the picture itself isn't reasonable. It's a picture.
She's five, right? I'm not sure I can support this picture... The art is great, but I don't know...
-Lucy is 8yo
-Lola is 5yo
-somehow 3 year make it acceptable
1. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
2. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
3. Are you retarded?
4. They are fucking cartoons dude
I just think one is allowed to have gut reactions to things. You don't have to agree with me. I just happen to think five year olds are too young for the activity being depicted here, and I could even defend that view with valid argumentation, but my reaction to the picture itself isn't reasonable. It's a picture.