Anonymous12: @O Rly: This argument sucks from every angle.
Either you say you don't like cut guys and every dude that was mutilated (including me) because their parents were "surelolwhynot?" about making the decision feels like someone missing a part that was taken against their will.
On the other hand, you can say you don't like uncut guys and accidentally endorse chopping off harmless body parts of people who can't consent purely for eventual sexual gratification for women who never have to deal with the chopping.
Could you imagine a father having a surgeon slice off skin from his daughter's clitoral hood before she can consent to it because it "looks better" and the men in her future might prefer it?
Like I said, there's no winning with this. You're either incredibly selfish or incredibly insensitive.
Anonymous13(12): @O Rly: I was just pointing out how you're damned if you do, damned if you don't with this argument. I wasn't saying anything about you specifically, those third person pronouns were meant in a general way.
Comments
- Reply
Sure is faggot elementary in here.
You're doing it wrong. Just fap.
- Reply
Either you say you don't like cut guys and every dude that was mutilated (including me) because their parents were "surelolwhynot?" about making the decision feels like someone missing a part that was taken against their will.
On the other hand, you can say you don't like uncut guys and accidentally endorse chopping off harmless body parts of people who can't consent purely for eventual sexual gratification for women who never have to deal with the chopping.
Could you imagine a father having a surgeon slice off skin from his daughter's clitoral hood before she can consent to it because it "looks better" and the men in her future might prefer it?
Like I said, there's no winning with this. You're either incredibly selfish or incredibly insensitive.
- Reply