Anonymous11: @Anonymous: Well It's just art, doesn't matter how old Tails canonically is, as long as no 8-year-olds were hurt because of it, drawn child porn should be fine. No children were raped because or this pic, were they.
Also to make it fair for pedos, the age of sexual consent should be lowered to 13 because kids that age are so horny they'd even consent to rape, and I speak from experience.
Anonymous13: Ok so I was here for the meme of reading comments on Rule 34 of Jim Carrey's Robotnik but what the actual fuck why are people defending child porn.
Anonymous14(13): @Anonymous: Huh. Alright, so like, you're a real piece of shit and I hope the knowledge that you like kids makes you feel like a shittier person. I hope every time you think about kids in a sexual way you'll be reminded just how ill in the head you are and if it weren't for anonymity, your statement would make you a walking freak. I mean you already are one, a disgusting wank stain, but at least people don't have to know that.
Anonymous15: IT'S RULE 34 YOU DUMB FUCKS. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE'S A KID OR NOT. HE'S A FICTIONAL FUCKING. CHARACTER.IF IT EXIST THERE'S PORN OF IT. THAT'S HOW THE INTERNET WORKS.IT HAS NO BOUNDS AND NEITHER DOES ART.GOD SHUT THE FUCK UP! IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT DON'T COME ON THE FUCKING SIGHT.
Anonymous16: @Anonymous: no no no... keep it at 18. Also brains are still developing a lot at age 13. The only reason pedos exist is because nobody likes them, so they take advantage of children who don't know any better.
- Reply
Also to make it fair for pedos, the age of sexual consent should be lowered to 13 because kids that age are so horny they'd even consent to rape, and I speak from experience.
Posted from my Nintendo Switch
Posted prom KFC ice cream machine