Rule 34

Cookies may be used. Please read our privacy policy for more information.
By accepting to enter you agree to our rules and terms of service.
main image
UploaderVHSephi,
avatar
TagsDragon_Ball_(series), Fate/Stay_Night, Fate_(series), Gilgamesh, Rule_63, Son_Gohan, crossover, padm
Source Link
Metadata LockedYes (Only admins may edit these details)
Info3508x2480 // 2.1MB // jpg

Comments

- Reply
Anonymous1: Holy shit what a weird crossover! I could never imagine Dragon Ball characters having sex with typical anime pretty boy characters.
- Reply
TerraLust: I'm pretty sure that's not Gohan, but I don't watch DB Super so I don't know her name.
avatar
- Reply
VHSephi: @TerraLust: is a female version of gohan
- Reply
Anonymous2: HTF is that Gohan ya wanker? Colour of hair and a tail? Fuck off, change tags fag
- Reply
TerraLust: @VHSephi: That form is only in DB Super. I looked it up and Gohan never attains it. Gohan never has a tail as an adult, and he only has a hairstyle that resembles that one for half an arc when he's a little kid. That is not Gohan. It's probably not even rule 63, I just don't know enough about DBS to know if it's one of the specific female Saiyans that appears in it.
- Reply
Anonymous3(2): Change the fucking tags asshole, lick your dad’s ballsack & micro-dick @VHSSephi
- Reply
Anonymous4: @TerraLust: This is a base form fem!Gohan. It's just that she is Bulma's child rather than Chi-Chi's.

Guide to comment formatting codes.

Report an ad?