Anonymous7: @zigmas: Dude, fuck you. You don't try to defend his work only after making a bad edit. This clearly isn't an edit he made and anyone with a brain could figure that out. Don't defend someone if you're going to make a mockery out of their work jackass.
zigmas: @Anonymous: HE made?
Where did I say THAT, you moron???
It is clearly MY edit, I merely CREDITED him for the original (which I liked a lot, ya know).
Like, how stupid you REALLY are???
Anonymous8: @zigmas Looking real old here, arguing on r34. It's not exactly known for being a place of philosophy. Still don't get your point though. Because you don't like critique, you redirect that into asking them to do the same thing??? If you don't want to be criticized, don't do something and then post it online.
Awesometeen956000: I'm not here for a fight, but this should have been left how it was. If it was ment to be a joke then fine, I've seen way worst. However, learn to realize people are gonna take this at face value. If you were really expecting someone to genuinely say this is a 10/10 piece of M.S. paint editing, well I'm sorry, I don't see it happening
zigmas: That was never a joke, but a kinda-hopeful challenge.
You don't like it?
Then maybe stop complaining about ME - and do something yourself?
What, YOU can't do a BETTER Paint edit, really?
LOOOL!
Anonymous9: while your actual edit is terrible ms paint trash, your use of the existing frames to enable the new animation is actually really well done. if you develop your art skills you might actually be pretty good at artistic choreography in the future
zigmas: @Anonymous: Check out >>2879835 and >>2912991.
Those are my choreographic edits without ANY touch of Paint (besides the text, which is kinda like subtitles anyways).
And then >>2862038, >>2864220, >>2868969, >>2890829 are all choreography with some Paint'ed cum drips.
I also agree that >>2897131 and especially >>2905294 ARE awful in comparison to "normal" stuff.
But I TRIED, at the very least, lol.
Awesometeen956000: Dude of course ">>2897131 and especially >>2905294" is gonna be better than this, you literally took someone elses art and re edited it with the same dick pic, just edited the frames. I mean if it was suppose to be a challenge, then the competition either didnt exist or didnt even try to end up worst than this
Awesometeen956000: Also the phrase "do it yourself", we dont need to do what you are just to tell you your edit is terrible. Just like one of the anonymous' said, you dont need a chef to tell you your food is spoiled.
zigmas: @Awesometeen956000: Shows that you didn't download the picture to view in your editor.
The Candy and Sumire pictures are actually edited so much that they hardly resemble the original they were spawned from.
Anonymous14: I mean it is kinda shitty but I've seen much worse on here. Main issue is your annoying fuckin attitude, I mean actually starting off by saying 'if we can do better why aren't we' like you're trying to preempt criticism is utter cringe, and is the dumbest type of whining, the ol' 'you do better then' garbage.
Awesometeen956000: Also if your gonna gloat about making something that barely resembled what you used to make it, why didnt you start from scratch? Just askin
Awesometeen956000: Also of course i wouldnt take my time to download porn onto my computer, anyone could get on it since im not the only one who uses it.
Beenus: @zigmas No yeah they totally do, you idiot. They leave "credit" because they believe it justifies the act of taking an artist's work and "editing" it without permission when it really is mostly just a faster way of allowing us decent people to contact the artist and inform them of your B.S. so thanks for that, you absolute troglodyte.
Anonymous20: Lol this dude's so defensive over an artwork that isn't even his, he even used @everyone. This isn't discord, it's not like suddenly everyone on r34 is gonna show up and bow to your amazing and holy edit because you said @everyone.
Anonymous21: Dude you knew people were gonna trash on your garbage art but you posted it anyway and then asked people not to judge it.
Nobody is jerking off to this. Literally anybody who sees this is going to laugh, don't try to convince yourself otherwise.
Smaller and kinda low quality, but YOU can always DO better, so why DON'T you?
@everyone:
Like I said - you don't like it, then you do better.
Or shut up and leave.
WHY SO?
- Reply
Where did I say THAT, you moron???
It is clearly MY edit, I merely CREDITED him for the original (which I liked a lot, ya know).
Like, how stupid you REALLY are???
- Reply
- Reply
You don't like it?
Then maybe stop complaining about ME - and do something yourself?
What, YOU can't do a BETTER Paint edit, really?
LOOOL!
Those are my choreographic edits without ANY touch of Paint (besides the text, which is kinda like subtitles anyways).
And then >>2862038, >>2864220, >>2868969, >>2890829 are all choreography with some Paint'ed cum drips.
I also agree that >>2897131 and especially >>2905294 ARE awful in comparison to "normal" stuff.
But I TRIED, at the very least, lol.
The Candy and Sumire pictures are actually edited so much that they hardly resemble the original they were spawned from.
Nobody is jerking off to this. Literally anybody who sees this is going to laugh, don't try to convince yourself otherwise.