traffik: I've been worrying about that possibility more than I'd like to admit, but the more time that passes, the more I think that there's no way Trump could win. Even if he makes it to the election, he will have virtually every Democrat voting against him, as well as an unusually large number of Republicans (I know several who wouldn't vote for him in a thousand years). I believe that if he's the Republican candidate for President, this election will see a record number of Republicans voting Democrat.
CrotchboobAddict: Trump is awesome, he is the only one to stand up against the NWO. How can anyone think to vote for Hilary, isn't she completely bought with jewgold?
Anonymous2: Of all the fucking places to debate politics...
@CrotchboobAddict: 'Awesome' in the sense that he inspires awe, perhaps, but not in any sense of being good at anything. And it's American politics; they're ALL bought and paid for by corporate interests.
@Urbane_Guerrilla: Is there something particularly wrong with socialism?
@Anonymous: My, where do I *start?* I'm of the Libertarian persuasion myself. Property rights should be kept as something sacred; this is why our economy prospered and grew. Lesser economies didn't keep property rights protected, and had no bulwark against unrighteous confiscations.
More briefly, no bulwark against theft. Socialism is a doctrine to justify thievery. It is often dressed up with collectivism, and a society devoted to collectivism doesn't prosper and doesn't grow well either. Trying to criminalize wealth, that's what they're doing. That kills prosperity.
Socialists also don't think gun rights are relevant, and aren't sympathetic to this human right. Bear with me here: that people with lots of private arms and armaments is a people against whom genocide can't occur. Socialist sociopolitical orders have committed the bulk of the genocides throughout the twentieth century -- and with gun rights and without socialism, we can leave it there permanently. Genocide is a nasty thing, a crime that indicts whole peoples; it's worth paying a pretty hefty price to escape it. In both its Fascist and Communist variants, Socialism has committed it. Without the broad distribution of power and of force, being politically incorrect in these societies is lethal to you, and you have no recourse.
I can add more. Who says pornsites can't be educational? Certainly not me!
- Reply
@CrotchboobAddict: 'Awesome' in the sense that he inspires awe, perhaps, but not in any sense of being good at anything. And it's American politics; they're ALL bought and paid for by corporate interests.
@Urbane_Guerrilla: Is there something particularly wrong with socialism?
@Anonymous: My, where do I *start?* I'm of the Libertarian persuasion myself. Property rights should be kept as something sacred; this is why our economy prospered and grew. Lesser economies didn't keep property rights protected, and had no bulwark against unrighteous confiscations.
More briefly, no bulwark against theft. Socialism is a doctrine to justify thievery. It is often dressed up with collectivism, and a society devoted to collectivism doesn't prosper and doesn't grow well either. Trying to criminalize wealth, that's what they're doing. That kills prosperity.
Socialists also don't think gun rights are relevant, and aren't sympathetic to this human right. Bear with me here: that people with lots of private arms and armaments is a people against whom genocide can't occur. Socialist sociopolitical orders have committed the bulk of the genocides throughout the twentieth century -- and with gun rights and without socialism, we can leave it there permanently. Genocide is a nasty thing, a crime that indicts whole peoples; it's worth paying a pretty hefty price to escape it. In both its Fascist and Communist variants, Socialism has committed it. Without the broad distribution of power and of force, being politically incorrect in these societies is lethal to you, and you have no recourse.
I can add more. Who says pornsites can't be educational? Certainly not me!
- Reply