USA citizens in these states, please call your senator to oppose the (misleadingly named) Kids Online Safety Act, SCREEN Act, Youth AI Privacy Act, and all forms of online ID check.
main image
UploaderNovichock,
TagsKaran_S'jet, Magi, homeworld
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info618x800 // 104KB // jpg
- Reply
Anonymous1: Is this really the only Rule 34 on Homeworld? I like it. Also it's Karan not Karen. :(
- Reply
Anonymous2: want moar
- Reply
Anonymous3: you'd think it's a perfect setting, seeing as she's just hanging there helpless and there's all kinds'a tentacles around her.
- Reply
Mong-Goose: Holy shit! This completely surprised me. Oh rule 34 you have yet to fail me!
- Reply
Anonymous4: Rule 34 has failed me repeatedly.
- Reply
Anonymous5: ditto
- Reply
Anonymous6: Yeah. No Zara Phillips, and only 1 homeworld piece?! I want Mothership Pr0n!
- Reply
Anonymous7: Do you know the problem with all the portrayals of Karan Sjet out there? She comes from a people who for countless generations inhabited a world that's bathed in UV radiation. Meaning? Meaning her skin should be a tad darker than they show. Karan Sjet is a sista.
- Reply
Anonymous8(7): Artist is Maki.
- Reply
Anonymous9(7): My it's Magi, not Maki (whoever that would be). I need sleep.
- Reply
Knives: Rule 34 is still failin me on a few fronts.
avatar
- Reply
Fara_Phoenix: This is quite a shame.
- Reply
Anonymous10: @Anonymous: No amount of melanin is going to protect against UV of that magnitude. She'd more likely be completely different from anything we have on Earth to begin with.
- Reply
Anonymous11: no there human
- Reply
Anonymous12: @Anonymous: No, they were only on Kharak for a few thousand years, and Kiith Sjet were a clan of scientists and historians who would have spent a bit less time out in the sun than most other people, so a lack of melanin would not pose a significant obstacle to survival.
avatar
- Reply
Fara_Phoenix: And still, no increase in Homeworld 34.


Report an ad?