CrotchboobAddict: @Nuxersopus: If SB was real then nothing would stop me from eating her sweet, soft marshmallow butt out. Does that answer your question?
@Roflcakes: Oh, I think you can have acceptable morals even if you jerk it to cartoon horses from a show for little girls. As long as it doesn't hurt anybody it should be fine, right?
Lapp: @Nuxersopus: No, stop, this is how the Holocaust happened
unattractive and unsuccessful Africans, the only acceptable masturbation is staring directly into the eyes of women you don't know, in public. It's shamless because they're real women, y'know.
Roflcakes: @Nuxersopus: I don't think that's how it works man... Not to get into a debate on ethics or anything but I think it's safe to say that masturbating to cartoon horses can be considered morally wrong (at least in the eyes of the majority), "underage" or not. I instead propose that the morality of the situation isn't something you should worry about, because it's entirely irrelevant at this level. If your actions were, say, directly causing harm to someone or impacting someone else's life, then I think it would be acceptable to debate on the morality of the situation.
TL;DR: Who actually cares about the ethical weight of niche fetish pornography.
shinazuka: I must say, when I posted this picture of a small cartoon horse and a small cartoon dragon having sex, I didn't expect a moral debate to be sparked. Of course that always happens on this site, so.
ConsciousDonkey: @Nuxersopus: Asking about morality of something you do alone is pointless, IMO. It is not hurting anybody, so it has no impact. If it was real pedo porn, then yeah, that would be bad because child abuse had to be done to make the pic. But fictional characters? That's hardly immoral. Perverted, but not immoral.
Anonymous4: @Roflcakes: @Nuxersopus:@ConsciousDonkey:
...I'm reading this comments, and then looking at the picture, and all I can think is "WTF, you're wasting time debating the morality of jerking off to a cartoon pony when you could've spent this time fapping to said cartoon pony!"
@Roflcakes: Well you see *raises index finger*
> Not to get into a debate on ethics or anything
Oh. *lowers index finger*
Can I atleast say that the majority doesn't have a right to judge since those people have no idea what they are talking about? In either way, I just said it.
@ConsciousDonkey: Alrighty, thats what I wanted to know. Thanks.
CrazyThang: @Nuxersopus: Not to harp on the moral/ethical dilemma presented to us here, but I wanted to point out that "the majority doesn't have a right to judge" is horribly inaccurate in this situation, as the majority is usually society, and society usually determines ethics. I say usually, of course, because only Sith deal in absolutes.
PonyPron: it's moral if your dick gets a little hard or your pussy a little wet. you can rub yourself to the edge and you're still ok. however, if you actually come to it, that's absolutely disgusting. if a little comes out, that's worth three fifths of a moral, but at least you've proven to the world that you have self control.
there's a couple tricks you can use to get around it. first, you can switch your mind's eye at the last second. the deity of orgasms only checks for violation when he comes to squeeze your glands. some hetero homo sapien sex in one of the approved positions should do it (face to face or deep throat) no doggie, that's gross.
the second trick is riskier. you see, each fetish is worth positive or negative morals.
examples:
ponies = -25 morals
ambiguously aged = -5 morals
vore = -1000 morals
rape = 3 morals
consensual missionary = 1 moral
mismatched chromosomes = -40 morals
since morals are multiplied together, you just got to find an even number of immoralities so the negatives cancel out. For example, on this picture we got ponies * ambiguouslyAged * mismatchedChromosomes = -5000 morals.
oh shit, it's really really immoral to jerk it to this picture. y'all motherfuckers need jesus pronto.
G_Goobington_the_2nd: For me, at least, underaged content is more about nostalgia than anything else. Because when the girl across the street invites you over to play some "special games", it can imprint on you.
CrotchboobAddict: I just like cute girls in most ages. And loli are often cute and fun (though, i hate obnoxious kids), nothing wrong with it.. if you keep it as a fantasy that is, heh. I'm too pretty for jail and I wouldn't want angry fathers that want to kill me.
Nuxersopus: @CrazyThang: And society has a right to judge? By which means? Being the majority? Thats not how it works.
Society can judge easily, but it doesn't have to be reasonable.
For example:
Rumor says that blue-eyed people are genetically inferior. Everytime someone blue-eyed makes a mistake people feel reassured in their suspicion. They start discriminating against blue-eyed people and those people are completely helpless since they are the minority (let's forget reality for a moment and assume its about 10%).
Then some mad guy comes to power and convinces his population that they would be better off if they killed all blue-eyed people. And so they do, they kill all of them, believing that they are doing the right thing, the most ethical deed.
Now were they right to do that? After all, they are the society and they have the right to shape their own world.
Anonymous6: @PonyPron: Whoah! Unecessary slam against vore fetishists out of nowhere! Look, I don't have a vore fetish (I don't understand the appeal, other than some deep symbolic meaning behind it), but just because you fap to that sort of thing, that doesn't mean you're morally bankrupt! So basically, you're saying it's okay to be turned on by young ponies, but having a fetish for vore makes you a horrible person?
PonyPron: @Anonymous: actually, I like some vore. I find it funny how repulsed people get about it. Rape being positive morals was supposed to be the hint that I'm always 100% full of bullshit.
Comments
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Well, a bit relating to this picture.
@Roflcakes: Oh, I think you can have acceptable morals even if you jerk it to cartoon horses from a show for little girls. As long as it doesn't hurt anybody it should be fine, right?
unattractive and unsuccessful Africans, the only acceptable masturbation is staring directly into the eyes of women you don't know, in public. It's shamless because they're real women, y'know.
- Reply
TL;DR: Who actually cares about the ethical weight of niche fetish pornography.
- Reply
- Reply
...I'm reading this comments, and then looking at the picture, and all I can think is "WTF, you're wasting time debating the morality of jerking off to a cartoon pony when you could've spent this time fapping to said cartoon pony!"
And on that note...*fap* *fap* *fap*
- Reply
- Reply
@Roflcakes: Well you see *raises index finger*
> Not to get into a debate on ethics or anything
Oh. *lowers index finger*
Can I atleast say that the majority doesn't have a right to judge since those people have no idea what they are talking about? In either way, I just said it.
@ConsciousDonkey: Alrighty, thats what I wanted to know. Thanks.
@MoLunge:
:<
Back to the foalcon folks. Fap fap and away~
- Reply
On that note, -fap fap fap-
there's a couple tricks you can use to get around it. first, you can switch your mind's eye at the last second. the deity of orgasms only checks for violation when he comes to squeeze your glands. some hetero homo sapien sex in one of the approved positions should do it (face to face or deep throat) no doggie, that's gross.
the second trick is riskier. you see, each fetish is worth positive or negative morals.
examples:
ponies = -25 morals
ambiguously aged = -5 morals
vore = -1000 morals
rape = 3 morals
consensual missionary = 1 moral
mismatched chromosomes = -40 morals
since morals are multiplied together, you just got to find an even number of immoralities so the negatives cancel out. For example, on this picture we got ponies * ambiguouslyAged * mismatchedChromosomes = -5000 morals.
oh shit, it's really really immoral to jerk it to this picture. y'all motherfuckers need jesus pronto.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Society can judge easily, but it doesn't have to be reasonable.
For example:
Rumor says that blue-eyed people are genetically inferior. Everytime someone blue-eyed makes a mistake people feel reassured in their suspicion. They start discriminating against blue-eyed people and those people are completely helpless since they are the minority (let's forget reality for a moment and assume its about 10%).
Then some mad guy comes to power and convinces his population that they would be better off if they killed all blue-eyed people. And so they do, they kill all of them, believing that they are doing the right thing, the most ethical deed.
Now were they right to do that? After all, they are the society and they have the right to shape their own world.
- Reply
- Reply
although we all know what happens