Lapp: @bAv-R34: I still don't think 0r0 fits that qualification, because he's actually one of the best colourists in the world of porn. :0
No one's denying his OC is obnoxious, but it's not full-blown creepy like Dragk, either. For worse or better, Dragk's been getting pretty damn good at art as of late, as well.
bAv-R34: @Lapp: I wasn't ever saying that 0r0 was a bad artist. I even have him subbed on FA in case he posts something that's cool, which he sometimes does. Sometimes. It's the self-inserts where he doesn't belong that pisses me off.
Dragk is a different story because he's in every single thing he does. If he's not present, it's implied that it's from his POV anyways. Which makes him a bigger faggot than 0r0. Except 0r0 is mostly a cool faggot, like Freddy Mercury.
- Reply
>inserting yourself in any way
Fuck, now we have a new 0r0/Dragk with us. Somebody get a gun before he metamorphosizes.
No one's denying his OC is obnoxious, but it's not full-blown creepy like Dragk, either. For worse or better, Dragk's been getting pretty damn good at art as of late, as well.
- Reply
Dragk is a different story because he's in every single thing he does. If he's not present, it's implied that it's from his POV anyways. Which makes him a bigger faggot than 0r0. Except 0r0 is mostly a cool faggot, like Freddy Mercury.
- Reply
>sub-par shirtless edit
Yeah, keep telling yourself that, bud.
1. Drawing is very good as same as some cartoons I see on CN.
2. Editing topless? it is not bad. In a fact, he did better than I did edits a long time on my Rule 34 galley under Cculber007
3. Well.....I just show where you are wrong so I have to share that, not keep myself.
Any more complaints? No? That is All, Folks!
- Reply
- Reply