PinkBallons: Couldn't care less about the crossover, but the "I have to rule 63 because I'm not a fag hue" thing rustles me.
Also that fursona is terrible. No real surprise there, though.
PinkBallons: @Nuxersopus: Why not just use a canon female character? 63 is already a pretty bi concept...Well, as long as you're familiar with the character in their original sex. Like them for what they are, I say.
Anonymous1: @PinkBallons:
I never deside on Shows or something what I comission I comissioned that because I liked:
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/1155058#search=spike this picture. What gender and what the char does in Shows doesn't mattter to me. And Renamon....I just put in because I needed a third char for that pose
ilr: The funny thing is... that most Brones don't consider their own neon recolor avat...whatever the fuck they call them... to be Furry OC's when that's exactly what they are. ...underage feral Furry OC's at that...
PinkBallons: @ilr: They're usually called OCs as well, and yes, they are technically furry, but having one in no way makes the creator part of the furry fandom, so it's rather irrelevant.
Calling them all "underage" and "neon recolors" is extremely ignorant.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
What have you guys done to the real R34Ponefaggots!?
- Reply
Also that fursona is terrible. No real surprise there, though.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I never deside on Shows or something what I comission I comissioned that because I liked:
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/1155058#search=spike this picture. What gender and what the char does in Shows doesn't mattter to me. And Renamon....I just put in because I needed a third char for that pose
- Reply
- Reply
Thank you for the response.
- Reply
- Reply
Calling them all "underage" and "neon recolors" is extremely ignorant.
- Reply
- Reply