Chris_Hansen: "Rule 34 is meant for porn of established characters, series, memes, or even inanimate objects. In short, it's meant for fan-art. It is not meant for things that were porn to begin with."
It's not fan-art & the guy mostly draws porn. If a comic was porn to begin with, then it's not 34.
Mother: The comic itself is not porn. There hasn't been any content in the comic itself that could not be shown on American broadcast television. However, the artist seems to enjoy drawing non-canonical porn involving futanari versions of his characters for reasons not fully explained.
So it is not a porn comic, and thus, for *this* reason, this art should not be ruled non-34. Whether or not an artist can make fan art of his own comic, however, is a completely different topic to debate.
It's not fan-art & the guy mostly draws porn. If a comic was porn to begin with, then it's not 34.
@Anonymous1 Why?
So it is not a porn comic, and thus, for *this* reason, this art should not be ruled non-34. Whether or not an artist can make fan art of his own comic, however, is a completely different topic to debate.