Domcis: While I consider the comment above an overstatement, I have to say, if I didn't know who this is supposed to be, Lux definitely wouldn't be my first guess.
Acrion: @Serenad3, et al. The image was originally a depiction of Jania Proudmoore. This edit, however, was intended to change it into Lux.
If you don't like it, tough shit. Go view something else.
Also, to the comments regarding "It doesn't look like Lux,"
Lux's face has a completely different look in each of her official depictions. I'd like to see you describe her appearance without using blond, young, female, or caucasian.
ibonihskrad: @Acrion: I completely agree actually. I knew it was lux just looking at the thumbnail since she was blonde,young, caucasian, had blue eyes, and under the league of legends tag. I just realized that those really are the only constants with lux's design now that you mentioned it.
jubilation_t_cornpone: In other words, all pics of Clover from Totally Spies should be retagged Lux too. And Vivian Porter. And a hundred other characters.
Acrion: No, that's not even close to what I'm saying.
I'm saying that in the event of an ambiguously animated character, the creator (or modifier) of a work's definition should be the ruling one, assuming there is any visible relation between the piece and the character being represented.
For example, a picture like >>936035 has very few defining features in it, yet it's tagged because the artist designated who was who.
The original pic is NOT ambiguous. Several people identified the character. You are taking a CLEARLY DEFINED character and replacing her with an ambiguous character.
Acrion: Are you kidding me? Do you even know what a bait and switch is?
What I've done is take an image of Jaina Proudmoore, and modify it so that it represents Lux. If that's not allowed on the site, then you've got a shit ton of pictures to re-tag.
Anyway, I see you're not going to change your mind. Do whatever you want, I'm done with this.
jubilation_t_cornpone: Of course it's a bait and switch. You linked to a pic with characters not clearly defined, but that has nothing to do with the situation, in which the character IS clearly defined.
Who's kidding who? You did not change JAINA at all. The face and body are identical. I compared the pics side by side. You didn't even change the costume, just the color of it. The only real change was the background. Congratulations, you transported Jaina into League of Legends, but she's still Jaina.
This is no different from taking some generic blonde anime girl, leaving her in the original clothes, adding a background, and proclaiming she's Lux.
"Lux's face has a completely different look in each of her official depictions."
So does Gwen Tennyson. But all of the incarnations are still tagged as Gwem. A lot of characters have different incarnations.
Tell you what I'll do: this one stays as is, but try again. This time change the costume to that of Lux. Then you can tag both girls/fandoms, plus cosplay. Jaina doing a cosplay of Lux.
Anonymous5(1): Guys, guys, guys, settle. Pretty much every female cartoon character looks the same. It's only their hair and clothing that lets you tell them apart. It's why Super Deep Throat works so well.
This could be Jaina, or Lux, or half a dozen other cartoon women out there.
Anonymous6(3): How is it Jaina doing a cosplay of Lux when shes still wearing Jaina's armor and looks the same as Jaina :P Normally someone changes there armor if its a cosplay
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I'd rather look at Jackazzes sketches that never ever get uploaded to this site than this half-assed edit.
It's an embarrassment for Lux, for League of Legends and for the artist AAA.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
If you don't like it, tough shit. Go view something else.
Also, to the comments regarding "It doesn't look like Lux,"
Lux's face has a completely different look in each of her official depictions. I'd like to see you describe her appearance without using blond, young, female, or caucasian.
- Reply
I'm saying that in the event of an ambiguously animated character, the creator (or modifier) of a work's definition should be the ruling one, assuming there is any visible relation between the piece and the character being represented.
For example, a picture like >>936035 has very few defining features in it, yet it's tagged because the artist designated who was who.
- Reply
The original pic is NOT ambiguous. Several people identified the character. You are taking a CLEARLY DEFINED character and replacing her with an ambiguous character.
- Reply
What I've done is take an image of Jaina Proudmoore, and modify it so that it represents Lux. If that's not allowed on the site, then you've got a shit ton of pictures to re-tag.
Anyway, I see you're not going to change your mind. Do whatever you want, I'm done with this.
- Reply
Who's kidding who? You did not change JAINA at all. The face and body are identical. I compared the pics side by side. You didn't even change the costume, just the color of it. The only real change was the background. Congratulations, you transported Jaina into League of Legends, but she's still Jaina.
This is no different from taking some generic blonde anime girl, leaving her in the original clothes, adding a background, and proclaiming she's Lux.
"Lux's face has a completely different look in each of her official depictions."
So does Gwen Tennyson. But all of the incarnations are still tagged as Gwem. A lot of characters have different incarnations.
Tell you what I'll do: this one stays as is, but try again. This time change the costume to that of Lux. Then you can tag both girls/fandoms, plus cosplay. Jaina doing a cosplay of Lux.
- Reply
This could be Jaina, or Lux, or half a dozen other cartoon women out there.
- Reply