Anonymous6: (Same as #4 and #6)
I don't know... I mean, don't get me wrong, I have a soft spot in my heart for dense pubic forests, and now that I look at the image again it's not entirely failsome, but I just don't like it when glaringly different levels of realism are applied to different parts of an image like this. A more cartoony bush would have suited it better.
Eh, whatever, it's still better than the massively overused bald crotch with nothing but a line for a vulva, or worse nothing at all. (Cue shitstorm about THAT.)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I don't know... I mean, don't get me wrong, I have a soft spot in my heart for dense pubic forests, and now that I look at the image again it's not entirely failsome, but I just don't like it when glaringly different levels of realism are applied to different parts of an image like this. A more cartoony bush would have suited it better.
Eh, whatever, it's still better than the massively overused bald crotch with nothing but a line for a vulva, or worse nothing at all. (Cue shitstorm about THAT.)
- Reply