Anonymous1: its a fucking worgen, the commissioner's character is a worgen, the artists drew the commissioner's character, its a god damn worgen. she has a mane and no tail. worgen have manes and no tails
Anonymous3: @anon2: people are just getting butthurt because their soul stealing game is getting 34'd in a more "furry" sense. They don't want to admit it's a damn worgen because they don't want furry porn to be related to WoW.
Anonymous4: People rarely, if ever, complained about all the tauren porn so your theory that people are QQing about furries is crap.
Shit doesn't look like a worgen, plain and simple. Doesn't have the facial structure, proportions, or shaggy unkempt hair that makes them distinctive. It's just a generic wolf furry without a tail.
Anonymous5: Anon2 and 3 don't want to deal with their own issues so they have to try and call out others. They don't want to admit they are blind when it comes to any form of porn.
Anonymous7: The artist tagged it as a Worgen pic, so, in a way, it has is place as a World of Warcraft pcture.
But it still a poorly done picture, the proportions arn't respected, that doesn't look like a World of Warcraft Worgen, and the furry guy has nothing to do here.
I don't spit on furry. I like good drawed furries pic. But the artist must evolve, improve. And the one who requests all this comissions should stop, because it's a polution of the World of Warcraft's tags.
Anonymous10: No worgen in pic. Hands, ears, feet, and legs are incorrect. Artist needs to get a reference of a worgen female before trying to draw one. I hope the commissioner got their money back.
Anonymous11: LOL its a stylized representation of a worgen, and the commissioner loves it and has gotten 10+ pics from the artist and will probably continue to do so. quit being a butthurt madfag anon10
Anonymous12: Hey i have a better argument than pic = or \= (does not equal) worgen. Argument: youre all missing the point. Its a 34 shut up and fap or GTFO. That simple.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Shit doesn't look like a worgen, plain and simple. Doesn't have the facial structure, proportions, or shaggy unkempt hair that makes them distinctive. It's just a generic wolf furry without a tail.
see the lower left corner?
But it still a poorly done picture, the proportions arn't respected, that doesn't look like a World of Warcraft Worgen, and the furry guy has nothing to do here.
I don't spit on furry. I like good drawed furries pic. But the artist must evolve, improve. And the one who requests all this comissions should stop, because it's a polution of the World of Warcraft's tags.
Where?
That's great! No seriously I think that's histarical.