Anonymous5: it is 63. it has tits, and also cum coming from the censor spot, which is to low to be the anus and if you zoom in just under the censoring there is what appears to be a slit, as in a vagina. next time actually look before removing tags.
Anonymous6(4): Those can hardly be called "tits". On top of there being clothing, at that angle pectorals are often visible. As for the cum - liquid travels downward. Too many jpeg articles to see a "slit". I think you're just reaching, anon4. It's called a "trap" for a reason.
Sintime: This is obiviously a girl version of Bridget, Japanese Picture ARE NOT censored at that spot at the display for male genitals, it would only be censored there ifit were female, there's nothing hanging there.
Anonymous7(4): There is nothing obvious about it. Japanese censorship in general is wacky, I've seen plenty of sacks centered. Since the character is usually male and the picture is ambiguous, it's not 63.
Anonymous8(4): It's just how paheal has always worked. If the image is ambiguous and the character is usually a male, then it's not rule 63. I'm sorry that male Bridget gives you a boner but that doesn't mean it's rule 63.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
and fuck you anon1 fuck you
- Reply