Ensse: It's kinda hard to make out, but if you look closely, in the bottom-left corner of the picture, you can see the artist's signature and a deviantArt page address. The name appears to be Duskfalls, so I tried it, and it worked. The R34 pictures here don't seem to be on her dA profile, but the signature is a match to her other pictures, and she does draw WoW characters and such. So, I think it's safe to say that, yes, this is a Worgen.
Anonymous4(3): A. It looks nothing like a Worgen
B. The other furry characters are certainly not WoW characters
C. There is no comment from the artist about it being WoW based.
Ensse: @Anon5:
A. Not saying it does. It's what the artist draws. Besides, for R34 content, I'd say it is close enough to be called a Worgen. If it really bothers you, then all I can suggest is that you talk to the artist about it.
B. Again, I didn't say they were. In fact, I don't think anyone said they were. However, as long as that one character can be considered a Worgen, then it's still legitimate Rule 34 content.
C. Well, I'll just have to see about that. I sent a message to the artist on deviantArt about the matter. Considering that this artist does draw WoW characters and posts them on her dA profile, unless the artist tells me otherwise, I think it's safe to assume that it is, indeed, a Worgen.
Anonymous5: "close enough to be called a Worgen" No. Nothing in this picture has anything to do with wow other than a vaguely wolf like furry. Hell, Maxjackrabbit doesnt flag all his shit as wow even though theres wolf like athromorphs in them and he does WoW art from time to time.
Anonymous9: Still a piece of shit. I don't spit on furry's, but this one is... erk.
An yes, i know "Don't post if you don't like / you can't even draw a stickman.". Still a piece of shit.
AnOniMouse: Yes its decent enough. There are faaaaaaaaaaaIcantbebotheredwiththismanyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar worse on here. Additionally, the worgen and the horse are in many pics on here...most with similar diapiyes but if they stay, this stays. Also now its 'easter', this is easter porn and allowed, methinks, no?
DTJ: I still don't get it. Those arts suck and yet the person commissioning the artist to make more of those. He also claimed that duskfall's arts are "fantastic" and he love them...
Ensse: @Anon6: I asked the artist herself. She says it's a Worgen. Your argument is invalid. You may now proceed to be a butthurt World of Warcrack addict. Oh wait....
Urbane_Guerrilla: Tailless, digitigrade (number of digits not visible), two-tone brown, maned lupinoid -- it's got the earmarks for a Worgen, and there have been those who say they prefer modeling Worgen after this fashion to the WoW graphics version, which they find ungainly. I come at this from a non-player perspective, full disclosure.
- Reply
- Reply
B. The other furry characters are certainly not WoW characters
C. There is no comment from the artist about it being WoW based.
- Reply
A. Not saying it does. It's what the artist draws. Besides, for R34 content, I'd say it is close enough to be called a Worgen. If it really bothers you, then all I can suggest is that you talk to the artist about it.
B. Again, I didn't say they were. In fact, I don't think anyone said they were. However, as long as that one character can be considered a Worgen, then it's still legitimate Rule 34 content.
C. Well, I'll just have to see about that. I sent a message to the artist on deviantArt about the matter. Considering that this artist does draw WoW characters and posts them on her dA profile, unless the artist tells me otherwise, I think it's safe to assume that it is, indeed, a Worgen.
- Reply
- Reply
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/feuerfrei - owner of the said worgen named Altxexit
An yes, i know "Don't post if you don't like / you can't even draw a stickman.". Still a piece of shit.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
oh well.