AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
UploaderFreezer, avatar
TagsAvengers, Black_Widow, Marvel, cosplay, cosplaydeviants
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info900x676 // 140KB // jpg
- Reply
El_Maestro_Misterio: I don't usually say this about cosplay porn, but... meh.
- Reply
Anonymous1: lol is the version of Byrne
- Reply
Anonymous2: I would love to bend her over and pipe her into next week!
- Reply
gallows187: how come "Marvel" and "cosplay" are viable tags but "Disney" and "incest" aren't? Aren't those the exact same types of tags?
- Reply
craggle: rules don't always have to be consistent. if the admin want to make exceptions, they can.

that said, i don't agree with the removal of the disney tag. disney does so many public domain characters that really it's the only way to distinguish in searches, say, a picture of hercules from disney from a picture of hercules from myth, is whether there's a disney tag.

marvel, however, is slightly different in one respect: it denotes a specific universe. marvel characters frequently cross over and trade casts. disney might have a few special crossover movies or games, but by and large everybody stays in their place. with marvel, on any given month, spider-man might appear in x-men or runaways or power pack, with no significant obstacle. and certain characters have, over their histories, been a regular cast member on every team book. and since the rules say to tag by series, you'd have to tag everybody by every series they appear in.

the best compromise is to have a marvel tag, use that, and otherwise tag by the comics they're best known for appearing in, or, if it's a picture specific to one book (she-hulk in her fantastic four uniform), that comic.

the reasoning for the cosplay tag might be to head off arguments of "but it's not 34 of that character, it's 34 of some girl dressing up as that character." so, cosplay tags cover that tagging loophole. incest, however, is just a specific sexual act. it doesn't matter in terms of tagging if people are related or not. so it doesn't need a tag.
- Reply
Anonymous3: @craggle

get a life
- Reply
craggle: says someone else flinging insults on a cartoon porn board to make himself feel superior.
- Reply
Vaan: She's holding those guns awkwardly...
- Reply
evil4563: A3 your saying 'get a life' on a porn sight.
Come on.
- Reply
Anonymous4: These images are really awkward.
avatar
- Reply
Richardthedragon: definitely looks like Natasha Romanoff
- Reply
Anonymous5(2): she is so fucking sexy
- Reply
Freeze_Lancer: 0.o wow Craggle, you thought hard about that. I read maybe half of it and I guess I agree. I got bored halfway through :x
- Reply
Anonymous6: she goes by Madison Valentine on FB
- Reply
Anonymous7: not bad with the costume on, with it off she looks like an old woman :(
- Reply
Anonymous8: face is the only good thing about this, when the clothes come off its a whole other thing, looks are deceiving and for the record, she is a fat bitch with no modelling qualities, curves are not fat you piece of shit anon4
- Reply
Anonymous9: That's the weirdest female body shape I've seen in a long while. It's like an ancient greek sculptor decided make a caricature of a modern 20th century drug addict.

Sagging "I used to be a whale" skin, Egg Shaped head, Sagging pancake tits that can be best described as "used up", the armfat rolls, the unhealthy blood clotted darkened veins in her thighs gasping for her, right foot, her left crumbled up foot, the caved-in chest that somehow hides her sternum, the absurdly high fat% loose-skin% in her groin/lower abdomen area.

Lastly the over the top "belly-suck-in" she does.
Good lord. She's the most oddly shaped woman I've seen in over 10 years, and I work with the elderly!
avatar
- Reply
appealus: Hello, Widow!


Report an ad?