SpY: @jubilation_t_cornpone:
Never seen a sideboob before eh? Here is how the breasts should be positioned if viewed from the side with an arm moved to the back:
http://img.funtasticus.com/2008/nov/081128sideboob/side-boob-2656.jpg
Notice that breasts never face forward from the chest if viewed from the top and character is standing straight, but stand out to the sides if not held by a bra.
Also, it looks like she has a hump on her back and legs are too thin compared to the rest of a body.
The wall is obviously curved, but the poster is not wrapped on to it.
The light is coming through the window, all shadows are casted correctly except the one under Smurfette where it appears to be dropped if the light came from above.
Anonymous3: I am highly amused by the concept (Gargamal=Dad is both canon and hilarious) but the execution is lacking. I agree with what SpY has noted. I mean, even ignoring reference material, the fact you can clearly see her vagina from this angle but not her other breast (or at least the breast turned a little towards us) shows how weird it is. It's possible to have the ribcage turned differently from the hips (this is often used to make a pose more dynamic) but then her breasts still wouldn't be perfectly in line. They would be turned more away from the viewer (which is hard to convey but is still true, I think.)
Not to mention, the legs and hips just aren't sexy. I give some leeway for stylization and personal taste but her arms seem too long compared to her legs and her calves should be thicker than her forearm. Combine these features with a big chest (or at least her ribcage being as thick as her hips) and it looks more masculine in general. Not that I have anything against manly-built women but it's weird in this case because I get the feeling she was intended to be more feminine.
Otherwise, I really like it. It's just the little details that ruin it for me.
- Reply
- Reply
Never seen a sideboob before eh? Here is how the breasts should be positioned if viewed from the side with an arm moved to the back:
http://img.funtasticus.com/2008/nov/081128sideboob/side-boob-2656.jpg
Notice that breasts never face forward from the chest if viewed from the top and character is standing straight, but stand out to the sides if not held by a bra.
Also, it looks like she has a hump on her back and legs are too thin compared to the rest of a body.
The wall is obviously curved, but the poster is not wrapped on to it.
The light is coming through the window, all shadows are casted correctly except the one under Smurfette where it appears to be dropped if the light came from above.
Not to mention, the legs and hips just aren't sexy. I give some leeway for stylization and personal taste but her arms seem too long compared to her legs and her calves should be thicker than her forearm. Combine these features with a big chest (or at least her ribcage being as thick as her hips) and it looks more masculine in general. Not that I have anything against manly-built women but it's weird in this case because I get the feeling she was intended to be more feminine.
Otherwise, I really like it. It's just the little details that ruin it for me.