1800: Well, she looks just like that in the comics, which are drawn better than this and with a more sexual context. You could just have linked the actual comic.
SlippyTheToad: http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1740
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1741
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1742
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1743
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1744
Those are the comics in question. It wouldn't be so bad if the head on this one didn't look so off.
1744 and 1741 would be excellent source for proper 34.
homeless: Apologies for the low quality pic, guys. This was a rush-job done while suffering from insomnia, but that's no excuse.
Somebody needs to do a better pic of her in this get-up, though. The strip had me so focused on Hannelore and Marigold lately that I forgot how damn sexy Faye can be. And then, bam: braless with no pants. Thank you, Jeph.
- Reply
- Reply
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1741
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1742
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1743
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1744
Those are the comics in question. It wouldn't be so bad if the head on this one didn't look so off.
1744 and 1741 would be excellent source for proper 34.
Somebody needs to do a better pic of her in this get-up, though. The strip had me so focused on Hannelore and Marigold lately that I forgot how damn sexy Faye can be. And then, bam: braless with no pants. Thank you, Jeph.