AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
- Reply
Anonymous1: All the cool kids are trying to reimagine Disney.

This is one example where the artist decided to reimagine Ariel with tumors instead of breasts.

...Seriously, hate breasts without nipples. They look so WRONG...
- Reply
Anonymous2: Under the sea, under the sea, darling it's wetter down where its better under the sea. :(
- Reply
muraebraun: I like them better without nipples, and clearly so does the artist.
- Reply
Anonymous3: fish don't have nipples
- Reply
Anonymous4: They're not breasts at all, they're egg sacs.
- Reply
SCAR3CR0W: needs to know artist please. need to find moar
- Reply
nickwario: This is....pretty cool.
avatar
- Reply
iKami: I agree, this is a really cool concept
- Reply
Anonymous5: Yeah, it's surprisingly good. Probably because it's not furry shit with hundred-pound tits and a cock the size of a whole walrus.
- Reply
Anonymous6: Anon4, all that changes about this, is that it becomes an Egg-Sac-fuck instead of a Titfuck.

Either way, I'd hit it.
- Reply
Anonymous7: This is shithouse. Stop being faggots. You wouldn't even know it was Ariel if not for the Flounder-esque fish there.
- Reply
Anonymous8: You're all dumb. It's clearly the evil octopus bitch and her eels dressed up like Ariel and Flounder.
- Reply
Anonymous9: this is really interesting
- Reply
traffik: Just removed a bunch of non-applicable tags from this. This is not Ursula, Flotsam and Jetsam in disguise, as A8 said (without providing a shred of evidence to back it up). The pic is still on DA, where the artist says "Its my own rendition of Ariel from The Little Mermaid. I dont think half human half fish would be equipped to stay alive long in the depths, so I adjusted her a little so she could."

Just a reminder not to go tagging shit on the word of someone who makes baseless claims. Do the legwork, get the facts.


Report an ad?