Anonymous3: This picture is rife with historical inaccuracy. For instance, the odds of Frolo not being circumcised at this period in time are doubtful at best.
Anonymous11: Anon 6 - Its considered a sin to have sex for any purpose outside of procreation within a marriage, so who really cares? Offended? Spend your time on Vatican.com or somthing. Anon 10 - if you dont want your so called childhood raped go away and dont come back to this site.
Anonymous12: Anonymous3, you're an idiot. Not only was circumcision NOT performed outside Jewish and Muslim groups in the 19th century, it has NEVER been commonly performed outside these groups in France. Frollo would absolutely not have been circumcised.
Comments
- Reply
- Reply
Frollo: >:[
WHAT IS WRONG WITH HIS FACE.
- Reply