VoltVision: I think we have opposing views (as in, your wrong to my right) as to what qualifies as pornography. Especially considering that she could very well still be wearing underwear.
GoodBoy741: There's a site rule that if a character doesn't have a lot of pictures, then some cheesecake that isn't strictly porn is allowed. This is only the 19th Arrowette picture, so I think that applies.
MMiracle: Even if that rule didn't exist, that's a bare ass right there. If you prefer to philosophize about the hypothetical existence of underwear you can't see in a fucking picture, knock yourself out.
VoltVision: Even if her underwear doesn't exist, there's nothing here that is pornographic. If you'd prefer to get angry on the internet because you're unable to draw vaginas, knock yourself out.
craggle: whether a bare ass or nipple is pornographic is debatable, but i believe it's pornography by the rules of this site in terms of what's allowed and what's not.
Coleoptere: In essence, it isn't pornographic on any scale beyond what you'd see in the comics relating to this character. The idea is to take characters that aren't set in a pornographic situation and then visualize them in one that is. In a world filled with scantily clad teenage girls, that means hardcore nudity.
Anonymous4: it is pornography since it doesnt show on a search engine with out having strict mode off. so just chill and get out your jar of peanut butter...
Comments
- Reply
- Reply