AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
UploaderNobody_In_Particular, avatar
TagsEl_Goonish_Shive, Grace_Sciuridae, Nobody_in_Particular, Rule_63, Sarah_Brown, Tedd_Verres, webcomic
Source Link
LockedNo
Info800x700 // 199KB // jpg
avatar
- Reply
Nobody_In_Particular: This is stupid and I'm sorry :C
avatar
- Reply
SlippyTheToad: I'd stick it in grace's pooper.
- Reply
Anonymous1: Sarah's such a friggin' voyeur.
- Reply
Anonymous2(1): "Don't mind me, just continue assfucking while I take notes..."
- Reply
Anonymous3: Is it voyeurism if you have sex in the front room?
avatar
- Reply
SlippyTheToad: No, its not ^3. If its in the front room then its exhibitionism, not voyeurism.
- Reply
Anonymous4: from what I hear, vaginal sex during pregnancy is fine, no risk for the baby
avatar
- Reply
SlippyTheToad: And even if it's not fine, that's an incestuous pedophilic threesome. I'm sure that filled somebody's fetish quota for the week.
- Reply
Anonymous5: THis is barely rule 63 this is practically CANON
- Reply
Anonymous6(5): This is barely rule 63 this is practically CANON
- Reply
Anonymous7: I think Tedd would vehemently disagree with that statement.
- Reply
Anonymous8: rule 63 doesn't really apply in stories where the characters have a means to change their gender... The rule was concieved in an environment where characters didn't apply it to themselves. It technically is rule 63... But it is in a state of being both at the same time. Schrodinger would approve.
- Reply
Anonymous9: A4, well for NORMAL people. I think Tedd is saying Grace is so super-big it doesn't follow the same rules.

TG guns can do that you know...
avatar
- Reply
Nobody_In_Particular: Anon9: that's exactly what I was going for. Tedd totally needs her to be as big as he can possibly take it, that little slut.
- Reply
Anonymous10: a4: lol, that may be true but read again the comment from our pregnant friend.
- Reply
Anonymous11: That's an odd-shaped chair.
- Reply
Anonymous12: I think it's two chairs
avatar
- Reply
obamasux: THIS IS NOT FUCKING RULE 63 U ASS FUCKS
- Reply
Anonymous13: @Anon8: Ironically, Schrödinger didn't even approve of his own cat in the end.

He decided it was too convoluted an explanation and there wasn't enough evidence collected to properly support it during his lifetime.
- Reply
Stonebrow: @Anon13: Actually, from what I understand, Scrödinger used the cat argument as a sarcastic argument from the very beginning. "Here," he declared, "is a cat, both alive and dead simultaneously! That's retarded!" (I'm paraphrasing)
- Reply
Anonymous14: I bet the baby is a boy which will be circumcised for better health and hygiene.
- Reply
Anonymous15(14): I bet due to failure to regress a C-section will be needed.
- Reply
Anonymous16: @Anon14: I find it very unlikely that this child will have need for stable genitalia, let alone modified ones...

Guide to comment formatting codes.

Report an ad?