Titanium: If food is the main point of the picture, or the people in it are representations of the food, then it is Rule 34 on food. If it's a random porn pic containing food, then it's just a fetish and not Rule 34.
Picture related to a good example of Rule 34 on food in my opinion.
Deuxsonic: It's hard to sort through several thousand pictures, so I always assume for every 10 or so pictures I upload, I'll lose 1 to it being site-irrelevant.
Deuxsonic: I try to get rid of as many duplicates and irrelevant shit as I can, because whenever you upload anything, you have to be ready to defend it's existance, and to ensure a solid argument, I _try_ to get rid of anything that would lie on the border.
Titanium: If it's borderline, but we don't have much of it (say less than 6 pages) then upload it anyway. Anything with only a few pages gets a very liberal definition of Rule 34. Something like Misty, who had 48 pages, gets a strict interpretation.
Anonymous5(4): I don't think I'll ever be able to eat food again. What if the food is alive (even if the living personification or whatever is in a parallel universe), and everytime I poke my food with a fork even things like lettuce, they feel pain. And when I eat the food and chew and later digest teh food, they feel pain. I don't think I can EVER eat anything again. Even if I starve to death I might be saving someone from having that kind of pain, even if the personification of the food is in a parallel universe that wouldn't make their pain any less real.
Comments
- Reply
Picture related to a good example of Rule 34 on food in my opinion.
- Reply
Anon - yes.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply