AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
UploaderDeuxsonic,
Tags2k-tan, 95-tan, ME-Tan, OS-tan, XP-tan
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info600x483 // 87KB // jpg
- Reply
nub: wtf do these sizes come from?
- Reply
Deuxsonic: They're just made up. The proportions aren't right with the numbers anyways.
avatar
- Reply
Kharnov: NEEDS MOAR GIGABYTES
- Reply
Anonymous1: This picture is incorrect. ME should be tubgirl.
- Reply
Anonymous2: OH GOD WHAT ABOUT VISTA
- Reply
Deuxsonic: Refer to the post about Vista here: https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/40295
- Reply
Suomynona: Deuxsonic; you can just use >> and then the image nummer for inter-site links, like so

>>40295

The moar you know~
- Reply
Anonymous3: 32 MB for Win95? Psh, this was the ONE time recommended RAM specs were pretty much okay: 8 MB RAM. I had a Pentium 133 with 16 MB RAM and I thought I was hot stuff. And then 98 comes out and it's minimum specs again.

2 GB for WinXP is a bit much too, as I could always run it just fine on 384 MB.

256 MB for 2000 is actually just about right, although I could live with running it on 192 MB.

Comparatively ME actually has the steepest RAM requirements - granted, by 2000 most people were running at least 128 MB but requiring at least 32 MB, it has the steepest requirements of the 9x family.

Guide to comment formatting codes.

Report an ad?