Anonymous11: Only official game she's been in is Sonic Spinball, and it wasn't a starring role. She and Bunnie were stowed away in pods with the other animals. She belongs to Archie.
Anonymous12: DiC created Sally but she's (c) Sega, Archie just has the privilege to use her like any other Sonic character, it's in the fine print of any given comic guys
Sypoth: @ anon 2, 5, Drax if she is not sega why the hell did she show up at Sega world?
http://www.saturdaymorningsonic.com/images/sonic_sally_statues.jpg
gman: Damn! Sypoth, you are getting annoying like a troll, stop screaming in every character that appears in the archie comics denying the tags, the tags are for identify it.
I mean tell me if Sega is using any of this characters in his games, tell me if DiC is doing it... the only ones that keep using this characters is Archie i think that Archie did a lot by keeping them in the stories, and not dumping them like Sega and DiC did.
And is obvious that they are accepted by Sega, because it's a co-production with them, but they don't even give a shit now, also that is Sega of America merchandice (just look at that horrible Tails and Eggman desing).
Also that Sonic Satam game was going to be produced by a north american company (obviously by Sega trademark) but was dumped and they made Sonic spinball instead, check the bonus levels were you can free Sally, Bunny and Rotor, and the sonic design was from the American series.
Anonymous15: will you fucks stop arguing about whether or not sally is owned by Sega or Archie or DIC? No one searches for her under either category. The only thing your various arguments are proving is that you are an annoying mouth breather.
Sypoth: Gman, the SatAm game was dumped because it was never intended to be anything but what it was, a prototype, it was made after spinball to show that it could be made and nothing more. If nobody likes me changing tags so that they are correct, well thats their problem. Fight it all you want, I will fix tags that I KNOW are incorrect, and point out to the poster that they are. In all honesty, arguments like these simply amuse me, thats why I participate. BTW, wheres the whole "DiC sold themselves leaving archie with all their stuff" proof I asked for? I even laid off of changing tags for a couple of days for you.
LOL, Sally is sega...
Ya right.
Meanwhile, holy shit, look at that stretched cunt
http://www.saturdaymorningsonic.com/images/sonic_sally_statues.jpg
Why is there official SEGA merchandice?
http://www.sonicgear.org/AustraliaPages/AustraliaItems2.html
why is she in fleetways Sonic the comic(only ones to use the original story line for Sonic)?
http://archive.sonic-hq.net/newsite/cartoon/before/
and in an unreleased game (got to 1:28)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pnsn0_w6K9Q
Not to mention several Sega documents that predate any licencing of the series.
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/sonic-the-hedgehog-bible-official-fanfiction-from-sega-of-ameri/
http://forums.sonicretro.org/index.php?showtopic=14100&st=0&p=280663&#entry280663
DIC may have made her current design, but archie has done nothing for the character.
I mean tell me if Sega is using any of this characters in his games, tell me if DiC is doing it... the only ones that keep using this characters is Archie i think that Archie did a lot by keeping them in the stories, and not dumping them like Sega and DiC did.
And is obvious that they are accepted by Sega, because it's a co-production with them, but they don't even give a shit now, also that is Sega of America merchandice (just look at that horrible Tails and Eggman desing).
Also that Sonic Satam game was going to be produced by a north american company (obviously by Sega trademark) but was dumped and they made Sonic spinball instead, check the bonus levels were you can free Sally, Bunny and Rotor, and the sonic design was from the American series.
- Reply