AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
UploaderArceus,
TagsBlackrose, Magnemite, Porkyman, Rotom
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info850x624 // 243KB // jpg
- Reply
da_cute_one: Maybe I haven't had enough coffee yet, but the first thing that came to my mind upon seeing this pic was "which one is the girl?"

That started an entire chain of Disturbing Implications, such as:
"Is this Rule 63?"
"Is this gay?"
"Do either of these Porkyman have an actual gender?"
"Is this even sex?"
- Reply
light167: 1. No it is not rule 63. EVERYONE LISTEN BECAUSE I AM TIRED OF SAYING THIS! Rule 63 only applies to a version of something that is strictly male that has been turned inot a female. Most Porkyman come in both genders, so rule 64 only applies to Porkyman that are only male (like Gallade for example). Genderless Porkyman (Like the ones above) are NOT rule 63, I'm not even sure that there is a rule for them. Also, a female with a dick added on isn't rule 63 either, that is called futa.
2. Genderless = Whatever you want it to be
3. I see no dicks or pussies, so, no, neither have a gender
4. I think this is more like two machines syncing rather then sex

Now that all the questions have been answered, you may fap in peace
- Reply
Anonymous1: Rotom: "Oh god, upload right to my hard drive!"
- Reply
Anonymous2: ಠ_ಠ
- Reply
Anonymous3: genderless or not, balls are touching here = gay.


Report an ad?