Although I do wonder if I've just caused my first "Uncanny Valley" reaction, where something is so close to real that one small 'off' thing will creep someone out (like was the case allegedly with the movie "Polar Express": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley ).
Then again, maybe he just an ass who thought my work sucked ^_^
Anonymous4: Oh for the love of fuck, get off of here, you faggots. It's porn. I can tell you that precisely fuck all people give a shit if it's any 'quality'. Taking pride in a 3-d rendered image is just sad.
And yes, the arms are jagged as hell, and the vagina looks like a bull got in there first it's so loose.
Anonymous5: 'Unless I can do better, I refuse to criticise someone else's art.'
Right, because I need to go to film school to decide a Uwe Boll movie is a piece of shit; I need an art degree to dislike a shitty drawing; And I have to take hours of CGI courses to recognise some blatant flaws in a render.
Chaos: Stop whiteknighting. If you don't -know- better, you should reconsider -defending- someone else's work.
Chupacabra: You seem like you've got a pretty good attitude, an' you're probably still improving. Just look at the area around the vagina; It's got some pretty blatant 'disconnection' issues, is all, and I'm fairly sure you'll get damn better at it in time.
It's called constructive criticism, Chaos. Look it up.
Chupacabra555: To Anon 5: Well, thanks for the comments. To be honest, though, what you just said is truly 'constructive criticism' (which I generally consider to be helpful hints on how to improve without being condescending).
Anon 3 saying 'Your work sucks' (even if he did offer the backhanded 'compliment' of 'you show promise') isn't necessarily constructive criticism.
As I mentioned I do have to learn photoshop better to 'postwork' my images (then I could have blended in the vagina and the arm jaggedness). If anon 3 (or anyone for that matter ^_^) wouild have said "here's a link to a photoshop tutorial on postworking" than that would have truly been constructive criticism (of course, since this post, I've done so myself, and have gotten marginally better with postworking).
- Reply
If I knew photoshop better, I could add some 'money shot' fluid effects around said 'action' :-)
- Reply
Although I do wonder if I've just caused my first "Uncanny Valley" reaction, where something is so close to real that one small 'off' thing will creep someone out (like was the case allegedly with the movie "Polar Express": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley ).
Then again, maybe he just an ass who thought my work sucked ^_^
Keep trying though, you show promise.
- Reply
This board would be wise to follow that path.
And yes, the arms are jagged as hell, and the vagina looks like a bull got in there first it's so loose.
Right, because I need to go to film school to decide a Uwe Boll movie is a piece of shit; I need an art degree to dislike a shitty drawing; And I have to take hours of CGI courses to recognise some blatant flaws in a render.
Chaos: Stop whiteknighting. If you don't -know- better, you should reconsider -defending- someone else's work.
Chupacabra: You seem like you've got a pretty good attitude, an' you're probably still improving. Just look at the area around the vagina; It's got some pretty blatant 'disconnection' issues, is all, and I'm fairly sure you'll get damn better at it in time.
It's called constructive criticism, Chaos. Look it up.
- Reply
Anon 3 saying 'Your work sucks' (even if he did offer the backhanded 'compliment' of 'you show promise') isn't necessarily constructive criticism.
As I mentioned I do have to learn photoshop better to 'postwork' my images (then I could have blended in the vagina and the arm jaggedness). If anon 3 (or anyone for that matter ^_^) wouild have said "here's a link to a photoshop tutorial on postworking" than that would have truly been constructive criticism (of course, since this post, I've done so myself, and have gotten marginally better with postworking).