Rule 34Cookies may be used. Please read our privacy policy for more information. By accepting to enter you agree to our rules and terms of service.EnterLeave UploaderYig, November 21, 2008; 12:49TagsAT-AT, Empire_Strikes_Back, Star_WarsSource LinkUnknownMetadata LockedNoInfo861x1000 // 99KB // jpgCommentsNovember 21, 2008; 13:16 - ReplyAnonymous1: That armor's too strong for blasters!November 21, 2008; 13:20 - ReplyHertzel: whutNovember 21, 2008; 14:14 - ReplyZeroXDash: Fukkin Saved!November 21, 2008; 16:31 - ReplyAnonymous2: FEATURE!November 21, 2008; 17:14 - ReplyMelynx: I agree with all of the above. This looks like it may taste of "Feature".November 21, 2008; 17:43 - ReplyTaepodong_Johnny: This would be SOOOOO GOOD, except that they're dangerously furry - despite being made from metal - look at the noses.November 21, 2008; 23:39 - Replythis_site_made_me_furry: But there is NO FUR...November 22, 2008; 06:01 - ReplyBomber64: That is awesomeDecember 1, 2008; 02:15 - ReplyAnonymous3: i think the pilot is highJanuary 7, 2009; 23:25 - ReplyAnonymous4: not furry , theres no nose the begin withJanuary 11, 2009; 03:51 - ReplyAnonymous5: I wonder if bald cats would count as furry.February 2, 2009; 21:47 - ReplyAnonymous6: Bald cats can grow hair, but hair would not grow on metal ever.April 14, 2009; 07:26 - ReplyAnonymous7: You got a problem with furry?May 13, 2009; 03:55 - ReplyReturnOfOctobot: Furry? It's made of metal...if anything it's a robot.June 9, 2009; 15:44 - ReplyAnonymous8: KinkyJune 29, 2009; 21:15 - ReplyAnonymous9: Instead of Yiff it's CHINK-CHINK-CHINK-CRANK-WHRRRJune 29, 2009; 21:27 - ReplyEternalKnight: "Left, down, rotate sixty-two degrees, engage rotor..."June 29, 2009; 21:47 - Replynagger: Forgive me for being a geek, but this has two legs... shouldn't it be an AT-ST? AT-ATs have 4 legs.June 29, 2009; 22:06 - ReplyAnonymous10: The arms count, dumbass.July 26, 2009; 08:48 - ReplyAnonymous11: They didn't tie up AT-ST's.August 13, 2009; 02:46 - ReplyAnonymous12: Johnny Means the pilots nose,Look at itDecember 16, 2009; 20:58 - ReplyAnonymous13: ...This is hotter than it should be.January 29, 2010; 21:44 - ReplyAnonymous14: Saved!May 11, 2011; 13:23 - ReplyAnonymous15: This is wrong, this is a holocaust of wrong.June 10, 2011; 16:24 - ReplyDetailfag: How has this escaped featuring?October 24, 2015; 04:28 - ReplyMysterious: Can I take her with me?!?!Guide to comment formatting codes. Report an ad?
Comments
- Reply
This looks like it may taste of "Feature".
- Reply
- Reply