AI fakes are not allowed.
main image
UploaderZeroXDash, avatar
TagsBatgirl, Batman_(series), Cassandra_Cain, DC, Robin, Stephanie_Brown
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info651x846 // 490KB // png
- Reply
Anonymous1: how is this not 63?
- Reply
craggle: because the characters not gender-swapped
- Reply
Anonymous2: Well, if you swapped their genders they'd both still be female. :P
- Reply
Anonymous3: Because anon1 Cassandra and Stephanie are, surprisingly enough, female characters.
- Reply
Anonymous4: I guess it's official rule 63... :P
I mean, they ARE based on male characters...
- Reply
craggle: no, their costumed identities are based on male characters. the characters themselves are not female versions of male characters.
avatar
- Reply
appealus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Brown_(comics)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra_Cain

Educate yourselves my friends.
- Reply
Anonymous5: if I see that fucking rule 63 one more time...
- Reply
Anonymous6: You people are obviously not true comic fans if you think this is rule 63. Dumbasses.
- Reply
Anonymous7: I am a true fan of only one comic, and that is Drawn-Sex.
- Reply
Anonymous8: I LOVE Steph...
how i hate having 2 import comics to the uk 2 c her
- Reply
PirateRenton: Source?
- Reply
Anonymous9: rule 63!
- Reply
Anonymous10: Anon7 fails at everything forever
- Reply
Anonymous11: You guys give Anons a bad name. THIS IS NOT RULE 63. These are female characters.
Stephanie Brown was the fourth Robin, following Dick Grayson, Jason Todd, and Tim Drake in that order.
Cassandra Cain was the fourth Batgirl, after Betty Kane, Barbara Gordon, and Helena Bertinelli. Therefore, this is not rule 63. Any anons that cannot understand this, please get the fuck out.
- Reply
Anonymous12: Woah, it looks like there's a hand coming out of Stephanie's head. I can't see Cassandra's arm reaching over so it just looks weird!
avatar
- Reply
Pyroking: This canon? Because I think it should be.

Guide to comment formatting codes.

Report an ad?