Psycho2332: this most definately has Meme potential and is better then some of the shit I've seen ((Like the Hank Hill edit of a pic, the Ronald McDonald pic, etc etc))
@#1: So her central nervous system's in her pelvis now? FFS, *severed heads* can continue living for a little while after decapitation. This chick still has fully functional and connected brain, spinal cord, heart, and lungs; obviously she'll die of blood loss pretty quickly, but that's far from instant.
@Psycho: This ain't bad, but I don't think it's quite distinctive enough to really be feature-worthy. Also, there's no way in hell the Ronald McDonald pic (assuming you mean the one with "him" breastfeeding a weird-looking baby) is crappy. The level of detail and technical mastery on that was astounding, and although I'm glad it's no longer the featured image, it was winsome shit.
btw what about the thing yelling "Chocolate" and orgasming chocolate or that commercial yellow dinosaur cumming in mac n cheese or the football helmets having sex or the lion fucking a car
there are countless pics worse then this that are featured ((The Ronald McDonald was unfappable in every definition fo the term "Unfappable" This is very fappable))
Anonymous4(3): Featured =/= most fappable. You forget about the lulz part of this site, which for most members is probably the major reason to come here.
Anonymous5(3): Clearly either you didn't read my post or you've never seen "=/=" before. =/= means "is not equal to"; it's a way to write the equals sign with a slash through it with a limited character set. What I was saying above was that the featured image is very rarely up there for fappability reasons. In fact, quite often it's the reverse.
Psycho2332: define "epic" and how this pic is not epic because as far as I could tell it is extremely epic in the way that as soon as you show it to morons who hate guro they'll go intyo a BAWWWWWW fest
Anonymous10(8): MY PENIS, LET ME BRUSH YOUR TEETH WITH THEM
also wouldn't any guro qualify for a feature in that case? I think >>109038 would be far more epic if we're going generic animu route. And many more childhoods raped. Especially if you saved that picture specifically to troll Naruto boards.
Psycho2332: well both of them would make good features ((better then most that ARE featured)) but this one spells it out (("Guro is love" )) that sentiment would also make for the anti guro BAWWWWW fest
An_Onymous: Psycho, a bunch of people trying and failing to explain to one moron how there's nothing even remotely special about his idea is not lulz. It's just tiresome. Give it up, seriously. Pics do not become featured around here because one person argues that they should be so. They become featured largely through the random whims of the admins, and to be honest I'm fine with that.
Rat: Psycho, you've become pretty much synonymous with failing at english so if I was you I'd shut up about that particular thing seeing as you do nothing but fail at it.
An_Onymous: "SaucyMacaroniCheese you in started in the failing of the english language"
WTF is that supposed to mean?
"An Ony that is but one of the many definitions of lulz"
I have yet to find a definition of "lulz" that does not have "funny" as a requirement, and neither the picture or this argument is all that funny. The picture isn't bad, really, but there's just nothing whatsoever that's special about it. And this BAWWW-fest on your part is, as I said, just tiresome.
Psycho2332: so your basically saying that for some unknown reason I'm the only one not allowed to use net speak ((even when I'm doing so to make fun of net speak))
An_Onymous: I'm not saying Soemele's right all the time, but based on his products around here, his knowledge of anatomy and artistic technique, his ability to speak clearly, and the general impression of wisdom he gives, I respect his opinion a lot more than I do yours, Psycho.
An_Onymous: You're not using "net speak", you're just babbling incomprehensibly, e.g. "SaucyMacaroniCheese you in started in the failing of the english language". Net speak means using slang terms and abbreviations that are common online; it does not mean randomly garbled English.
Psycho2332: An Ony...the lulz comes from the reaction it would get from anti guro people ((IE people who faint at the sight of blood)) due to the phrase "Guro is Love" being written in blood.
btw I didnt start using net speak untill Sarah used the term "fail" by claiming that I was fail ((Yes netspeak fucks grammar))
and like I said if most of the crap that is featured ((I posted the URL's of the only worthy of feature pics THAT ARE CURRENTLY FEATURED))
pics that have nothing special then this is worthy of feature
Psycho2332: How often does "Net Speak" come from Spelling/grammar errors ((IE Lulz, you are fail, etc)) or translation errors ((All your base are belong to us))
An_Onymous: The reaction, were it to occur, would be the same as the picture: predictable and nothing special.
Netspeak has its own rules, its own grammar; it's not just random manglings of English. "In started in", for instance, is still fucking nonsense. If people don't understand what you're talking about, you're doing something wrong.
If anything, lame pictures being featured in the past is a motive to feature BETTER stuff now, not to persist in featuring unworthy crap, which is basically what your argument boils down to: "Since unworthy stuff has been featured before, that must mean it's a good idea to do so again now."
Seizurepirate: Psycho : This is NOT hardcore guro that would elicit a PROPER response from anti-guro people. It's not funny- it's not incredibly detailed like Soemele's pictures and other than the fact that YOU can obviously fap to it, I don't see anything special about this picture at all. Saying that 'guro is love' being written in blood is what makes it 'lulzy' makes me seriously wonder if you understand what 'lulz' ARE.
"SaucyMacaroniCheese you in started in the failing of the english language" NOT netspeak. I'd use the '=/=' sign but you obviously don't understand what that means either.
Basically, I equate you to any other 14 year old fanboy who saw something fappable and decided that it's the best thing ever and that it MUST be featured because it gets him off.
Rat: Just because a lot of it comes from stuff being spelled wrong (usually to make it easier and faster to type, to make it funnier or to define something new that previously had no definition) or translated wrong (like the intro to Zero Wing aka "All your base are belong to us!") doesn't mean you can make spelling and grammar errors at random and call it netspeak.
An_Onymous: Psycho, the thing is, those aren't really "errors" in any contemporary sense. Many of them (e.g. "lulz") weren't even errors to begin with, but were deliberately created. And in any case, you've completely ignored my statement that internet slang has ITS OWN GODDAMN RULES that, while not the same as those of standard English, still exist and can be broken. Breaking them often results in garbage like the stuff I've mentioned above.
An_Onymous: I see Rat and I are largely saying the same thing simultaneously. Given the redundancy, perhaps I should leave. Were this a forum, this thread would probably have already been locked by now due to the high levels of rampant butthurt faggotry.
Psycho2332: 1. I never claimed it WAS hard core guro NOR detailed
2. personally I would say more guro is worthy of being featured ((Including all of Soemele's pics)) which is why I consider the one that IS featured to be one of the few Featured pics that are worthy of being featured
3. listen to the full sentiment that I am saying ((I'll use all caps to get it through))
IF A PIC OF RONALD MCDONALD BREAST FEEDING, A PIC OF A LION FUCKING A CAR, A PICTURE OF A DICK GIRL ELU FUCKING THE BLUE DIVA'S BODY AND IF MOST OF THE SHIT THAT IS FEATURED IS WORTHY OF BEING FEATURED THEN SO THE FUCK IS THIS
Psycho2332: okay I'll find the worse of the worse to point out how this place is apparently just like a pornographic version of DA ((Feautring crap)) and once again post URLs
Psycho2332: normaly copy pasting a URL makes a clickable link
well...that's fucked up
seriously though the longer list of links are the ammount of blatent pieces of shit that are on the featured list ((Although the list of only 3 is the only 3 THAT ARE FEATURED that DESERVE TO BE FEATURED))
basically featuring a bunch of crap is something DA does so apparently this is a pornographic version of DA
Seizurepirate: Yeah, I was wondering what was BAWW about my comment.
Psycho, how many times does it honestly have to be said? THIS ISN'T FUNNY. THOSE were at least POTENTIALLY funny, childhood raping or relevant to the time in which they were posted {such as the football helmets} or, in the case of the inflatable shark, just fucking awesome and creative. Your newfaggotry obviously knows no bounds.
Also, I hadn't seen the hand turkey one before- that is fucking brilliant.
An_Onymous: *sigh* Psycho, to make a clickable link to an image, type two right-pointing angle brackets and then the number of the image. You see the number in each of the URLs you posted? Yeah, that number. Just type >> and then the number, and you'll make a link. Like this: >>98946
Looch: Jesus Christ, the argument is over, Psycho! No one but you wants this featured, nor does anybody give a flying fuck about your OPINION on other featured pics!
Psycho2332: now hopefully you understand that since most of what IS featured is crap ((Only three pics that are there should be there)) which would mean the standards of "Featured Image" is low then this pic fits within those standards
((With everything made by Soemele as well as everything made by Kevin Kinne and that mutilated Sakura pic, the pic of the HDDVD logo being raped, as well as many many MANY other things that are too numorous to list here))
Psycho2332: Soemele,Kevin Kinne, and Nure Milk Bravo make AWSOME pics that are ALL feature worthy by just about any standards as well as the Sakura mutilated pic
this pic, the HDDVD logo being raped by the Blu Ray logo pic, as well as many others are feature worthy with the apparently low low low standards of "featured image" on this site
now sorry if I used too many big words but that is basically what I am trying to get accross
Looch: MY OPINION, LET ME BEAT YOU TO DEATH WITH IT!!!
When you become an admin, you can make all the features you want. Until then, STFU and accept that no matter how much you BAWWW about it, this image is NOT feature worthy. In fact, I vote "Deleteme." Any seconds?
An_Onymous: I do not think it should be deleted, as it doesn't satisfy any of the conditions for deletion. I do think these comments should be deleted, though.
Looch: Poor Psycho, doesn't anyone understand the true nature of your genius? Why can't anyone understand that only torso's in non-sexual positions and random chicks getting hung are the only thing worth posting?
Anonymous15: ... Am I the only one to wonder why this was tagged as Amelia from Slayers?
Wrong hairstyle, wrong hair COLOR, outfit doesn't match Amelia's (Wrong color gem, doesn't have same color trim on the cloak, and the style is different). Not Amelia.
- Reply
But this... man... she'd be so dead. She would have died the second her central nervous system was disconected.
- Reply
@#1: So her central nervous system's in her pelvis now? FFS, *severed heads* can continue living for a little while after decapitation. This chick still has fully functional and connected brain, spinal cord, heart, and lungs; obviously she'll die of blood loss pretty quickly, but that's far from instant.
@Psycho: This ain't bad, but I don't think it's quite distinctive enough to really be feature-worthy. Also, there's no way in hell the Ronald McDonald pic (assuming you mean the one with "him" breastfeeding a weird-looking baby) is crappy. The level of detail and technical mastery on that was astounding, and although I'm glad it's no longer the featured image, it was winsome shit.
btw what about the thing yelling "Chocolate" and orgasming chocolate or that commercial yellow dinosaur cumming in mac n cheese or the football helmets having sex or the lion fucking a car
there are countless pics worse then this that are featured ((The Ronald McDonald was unfappable in every definition fo the term "Unfappable" This is very fappable))
- Reply
- Reply
We ain' mindreaders you know
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/71928?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/58026?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/16263?search=featured_image
that's it
as for this pic it could get rises out of anti guro fags ((IE morons who cry and faint over blood))
- Reply
>>27242
>>80783
>>73332
>>100885
my personal favorites btw.
also wouldn't any guro qualify for a feature in that case? I think >>109038 would be far more epic if we're going generic animu route. And many more childhoods raped. Especially if you saved that picture specifically to troll Naruto boards.
- Reply
>>80145
seriously though this is epic when compared to 99% of the crap that is featured
2. An Ony that is but one of many definitions of "lulz"
just mostly
but even the best among us are wrong occasionally
- Reply
WTF is that supposed to mean?
"An Ony that is but one of the many definitions of lulz"
I have yet to find a definition of "lulz" that does not have "funny" as a requirement, and neither the picture or this argument is all that funny. The picture isn't bad, really, but there's just nothing whatsoever that's special about it. And this BAWWW-fest on your part is, as I said, just tiresome.
- Reply
btw I didnt start using net speak untill Sarah used the term "fail" by claiming that I was fail ((Yes netspeak fucks grammar))
and like I said if most of the crap that is featured ((I posted the URL's of the only worthy of feature pics THAT ARE CURRENTLY FEATURED))
pics that have nothing special then this is worthy of feature
Netspeak has its own rules, its own grammar; it's not just random manglings of English. "In started in", for instance, is still fucking nonsense. If people don't understand what you're talking about, you're doing something wrong.
If anything, lame pictures being featured in the past is a motive to feature BETTER stuff now, not to persist in featuring unworthy crap, which is basically what your argument boils down to: "Since unworthy stuff has been featured before, that must mean it's a good idea to do so again now."
"SaucyMacaroniCheese you in started in the failing of the english language" NOT netspeak. I'd use the '=/=' sign but you obviously don't understand what that means either.
Basically, I equate you to any other 14 year old fanboy who saw something fappable and decided that it's the best thing ever and that it MUST be featured because it gets him off.
- Reply
- Reply
2. personally I would say more guro is worthy of being featured ((Including all of Soemele's pics)) which is why I consider the one that IS featured to be one of the few Featured pics that are worthy of being featured
3. listen to the full sentiment that I am saying ((I'll use all caps to get it through))
IF A PIC OF RONALD MCDONALD BREAST FEEDING, A PIC OF A LION FUCKING A CAR, A PICTURE OF A DICK GIRL ELU FUCKING THE BLUE DIVA'S BODY AND IF MOST OF THE SHIT THAT IS FEATURED IS WORTHY OF BEING FEATURED THEN SO THE FUCK IS THIS
NOBODY BUT YOU FINDS THE IMAGE TO BE FUNNY. However, the comment thread is understandably seen as hilarious by all.
THE TRUTH.
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/87270?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/84763?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/73332?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/84325?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/72581?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/66407?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/41091?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/20545?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/13161?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/16849?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/27242?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/3295?search=featured_image
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/1850?search=featured_image
Now if these pieces of shit are worthy of being featured then surely this picture is
<--- fail
not to mention THIS piece of shit
well...that's fucked up
seriously though the longer list of links are the ammount of blatent pieces of shit that are on the featured list ((Although the list of only 3 is the only 3 THAT ARE FEATURED that DESERVE TO BE FEATURED))
basically featuring a bunch of crap is something DA does so apparently this is a pornographic version of DA
- Reply
>>87270
>>84763
>>73332
>>84325
>>72581
>>66407
>>41091
>>20545
>>13161
>>16849
>>27242
>>3295
>>1850
>>98946
all those that are posted as links are pieces of crap that for some reason ((Maybe the admin was drunk)) was considered to be featured
now if those pics are "feature material" despite being pieces of shit then surely a pic like this would also fit the bill
Psycho, how many times does it honestly have to be said? THIS ISN'T FUNNY. THOSE were at least POTENTIALLY funny, childhood raping or relevant to the time in which they were posted {such as the football helmets} or, in the case of the inflatable shark, just fucking awesome and creative. Your newfaggotry obviously knows no bounds.
Also, I hadn't seen the hand turkey one before- that is fucking brilliant.
>>58026
>>16263
two of the ones I've said are feature material are not guro eather ((Damn I hope this works))
((With everything made by Soemele as well as everything made by Kevin Kinne and that mutilated Sakura pic, the pic of the HDDVD logo being raped, as well as many many MANY other things that are too numorous to list here))
You forgot the 'in my opinion' part for some strange reason.
this pic, the HDDVD logo being raped by the Blu Ray logo pic, as well as many others are feature worthy with the apparently low low low standards of "featured image" on this site
now sorry if I used too many big words but that is basically what I am trying to get accross
When you become an admin, you can make all the features you want. Until then, STFU and accept that no matter how much you BAWWW about it, this image is NOT feature worthy. In fact, I vote "Deleteme." Any seconds?
- Reply
And it has BIG BOOBIES so STFU.
because shit is exactly what most of those pics are
- Reply
- Reply
but apparently that part also slipped by you
it would seem like it is pointless to contenue though as it is ultimately up to the admins to choose what get's featured reguardless of logic
- Reply
- Reply
That wasn't a joke. I genuinely wasn't sure which one you meant. Which is it?
Here's what I'm curious about. This comments thread was dead for quite a while. Who revived it?
- Reply
And anon8, fyi.
- Reply
- Reply
I mean he's missing. *hides shovel* o_o
- Reply
I swear I remember two.
- Reply
- Reply
Wrong hairstyle, wrong hair COLOR, outfit doesn't match Amelia's (Wrong color gem, doesn't have same color trim on the cloak, and the style is different). Not Amelia.